Friday, June 11, 2010

While Stepping into a Law School… Part II

What are the skills required to a lawyer? From whatever little I have seen of the profession, I can divide the skills into 3 different types of skills-Skills that can be developed while at the law school, personality traits or office skills and court room skills.

Law School Skills

I have just spoken of the number of laws and how it is impossible to know them and how lawyers are required to know ‘where’ to find the law and ‘what to make’ of it above. This is a primary skill officially called ‘Research’ and ‘Analysis’.

Learning ‘Research’ is fairly easy. All you have to know is how to use several databases to extract information relevant to your cause. It includes books, internet, computer based databases, Law Journals and sometimes, when you are looking for a little expert information, the databases relating to such information. For example, if you are working on a case involving, let us say, surrogacy, you need to know the medical aspects of surrogacy as well.

Learning ‘Analysis’ is a life long process. Honestly, most educated minds are doing analysis at a subconscious level all the time. For example, when you decide to buy a certain model of a scooter averaging 50 kpl for 50,000 rupees over a cheaper model costing 35,000 rupees but averaging only 40kpl, you have processed the information to reach a conclusion that spending more right now makes more sense because by buying a scooter that mileages more, you are actually saving more money in the long run. Here, the prices and the mileages of the scooters are mere information. Your conclusion is your analysis.

Again, this fact situation is fairly simple involving mere facts. When you have to process facts along with several esoteric rules to reach a conclusion, the process becomes fairly difficult. Most judgments are conclusions reached after taking into consideration these facts along with the esoteric rules. That is why I strongly recommend reading real texts of judgments and the text books written using the Case Book Method.

It is needless to mention that it is this skill that will help you all your life in no matter what you decide to do after taking your law degree. You need to analyze while making every important conscious decision of your life.

Office Skills

Though I have labeled these as office skills, I do strongly think, that one may begin to develop them while at the law school itself. When you start working, you need only to sharpen them.

‘Trust’

Let us say you are suffering from a serious ailment which requires going under the scalpel. The operation is likely even to cause your death if anything goes wrong. Would you entrust your life into the hands of someone who passed out from a Medical School yesterday? Unless, you are insane, your answer will be a firm and a certain no. But you certainly will entrust it into the hands of someone who has done several such operations, won’t you?

The business of a lawyer is very similar to that of a doctor. It is serious. You’re dealing with the lives and hard earned money of other people. It is very necessary therefore to ‘win the their trust’. The way you talk to people, the way you interact with them, you should seem authoritative, yet friendly and approachable. You should look like and be someone people around you like will trust for your word.

Developing this persona is a skill. Everyone ends up finding different ways to develop it. I suggest talking to diverse groups of people on any subject under the sun. I say ‘any subject under the sun’ because it brings in a sort of humility in a person- because then you know, you don’t know much and yet while you remain confident of your ability to express your thoughts, you end up having ‘respect’ for thoughts you disagree with and subjects you know nothing of. You may also end up knowing a lot about things you know nothing of. This was the sort of exposure LST was able to give me. What you should be happy about is that most law schools are filled with diverse people from all over India and doing this is fairly easy.

While Stepping into a Law School… Part I



The other day a friend suggested why I don’t write about my experiences at the law school now that I am almost a lawyer. I don’t know how much I know because I have seen people who know much, much more. The way I see it, I’m absolutely incompetent for the task. But on second thoughts, when I compare myself to what I knew as a person interested in law and as person who possesses a law degree, I do know of certain insights in the profession which I may share with everyone interested.

First myth is that ‘lawyers know the law’. Let us just do some Math. There are over 33, 00, 000 statutes in India, add to these the innumerable customs and traditions of different places applicable as law to those places, the multitude General Resolutions of the Government, the various Notifications, the rules under all these enactments plus the judgments passed every day by courts all over the world from all common law countries and treaties and conventions the nations have entered into etc. In short, it is impossible for anyone to know the law. No lawyer ‘knows’ the law.

What do lawyers do then? They are simply required to know how to ‘find’ the law applicable and then when all applicable laws are found and understood, making out what do ‘they mean’. The task is not as simple as it sounds because most of the times more than one law are applicable to a particular fact situation. They are often vague, ambiguous, contradictory, written in a language difficult to understand etc. While advising a client you have to take into consideration the ‘combined effect’ of all these laws put together along with the ‘client specific’ or the ‘case specific’ concerns. Point being becoming lawyer is not rote learning, it is learning a thought a process- learning ‘how to think.’

How does one learn this thought process? I did not go to a premiere law school. I do not know what are the methods used by the professors or teachers there to imbibe these skills in their students. Personally however, I would strongly recommend reading real texts of as many judgments as possible. I would strongly recommend reading textbooks written using the Case-Book Method and books of Lord Denning. Over a period of time, you will realize that ‘law’ is not an abstract concept which can stand independently on its own. It is a philosophy developed over ages which, just like poems, means different things to different people at different times. Just that laws, unlike poems, do not always rhyme.

To give an example of what I mean let us take the case of two baby siblings who want to share equally one bar of chocolate someone has given them. It is most likely that they will take the bar to their mother and trust her to break it into two equal pieces for them. The mother will then break the bar into two pieces and hand them a piece each.

Here, in spite of the fact that neither the siblings, nor the mother know a zilch about law the facts to be noted from a lawyer’s perspective are the sense the siblings have that ‘justice needs to be done’, that ‘it has to be done by someone impartial’ and finally the fact that ‘mother does justice.’  Point simply being, that no matter what we all do, we all have an inherent notion of what is ‘just’ and ‘fair’ irrespective of whether we know the law.

The fact situation I have created above is fairly simple. In real life, the situations are much more complicated and stakes much higher than a chocolate bar.

 The study of ‘law’ therefore is both, the study of this ‘notion’ and an ‘activity’ which will enable us to develop over time our own ‘notion’ suitable to the needs of the present society. The more you study, the more you develop your ‘notion’ and that is precisely why older lawyers charge much, much more than younger lawyers.

Thursday, March 11, 2010

Tumhari Bohot Yaad Aati Hai...

Kuch thandi hawa ke jhonko me,
Tumhari khushboo aati hai;
Tanhai me, sannate me kabhi,
Tumhari hasi khilkhilati hai;
Ankhen band kar lu to,
Tumhari hasti hui chhavi nazar aati hai;

Sach-me, tumhari bohot yaad aati hai.....

Friday, March 05, 2010

Sapno Se Darr..

Aaj kal mujh par ek ajeeb sa jwar chadne laga hai,
Apne hi sapno se mujhe darr lagne laga hai…

Dosti ke bandhan ab chhootne-se lage hai,
Na jaane kyu, sab dost ek dusre se ruthne-se lage hai…

Duniya ka sach or jhuth dikhne-sa laga hai,
Apne aap se mera vishwas uthne-sa laga hai…

Maine khudko kabhi hara hua nahi samjha,
Magar jeet ka shikhar ab aur ooncha lagne laga hai…

Apne hi sapno se mujhe darr lagne laga hai…

Monday, January 18, 2010

Names

Sometimes it’s extremely funny what names around you are.

Out side the GTB Station you’ll find a shop with the name plate “Maai Shoppee” written in devnagari on it. The shopkeeper probably wanted to name it “My Shoppee” in English but that’s a little dicey when you’re in Mr. Raj’s raj. So “Maai Shopee” now means “Mother Shop”, literally interpreted- a shop where you can buy mothers! I’m glad my mother rarely has to go to the GTB station. She usually travels only in cars and buses but the moment she comes to know of it, she’ll put herself up for sale over there. She desperately wants a different son!

One of my neighbors is Mr. Bias. He’s a judge.

The Hanuman temple on the hill around which my college is situated is called Pensioner Hanuman Mandir. I had an honest belief that lord Rama paid some kind of pension to the Hanuman in that Mandir for the devoted life long service that Hanuman did to him. However, one day I was told the name comes from the fact the all the pensioners in the city go to that temple for their morning walks! What a pity! So even after life long devoted service not even one Hanuman gets any pension! He should meet my friend Akshay. Akshay’s good with labour law.

All, and I mean almost all, photocopy shops are always named “Jalaram”, all raddi depots are always “Mahavir” raddi depots and all jeweler shops are always “Nakoda” jewelers. In fact, I’m so used to them that once I tried selling my raddi to a Mahavir Dairy because after reading Mahavir on the name plate I didn’t really care what else he’d written ahead! Finally, one day I asked one of the “Jalaram Xerox” owners why did they not name their shops after something else. He said Jalaram was their god and they believed in him for their business. I didn’t say anything to him but dude, I had no clue they had representative democracy with each god heading a trade union of a particular business in the heaven up there. I used to think all profit hungry people always worshipped Lakshmi, probably the finance minister.

My cousin, an MBA from Australia, is very annoyed that businessmen in India don’t really know how to ‘build brands’ or market themselves. Like in spite of being well known Jalaram, Nakoda, Mahavir etc. are still not brands, similarly, you find people naming their enterprises after weird things. Like one of the really famous (note: famous, not necessarily one of the better ones) builders in Pune, Mumbai and Nashik area- Haware Builders. Haware in Marathi means “Greedy”. Being greedy is a quality to be taken for granted amongst builders. Why would any builder want to particularly emphasize on it? But they do! Is it a wonder that they’re not one of the “better” builders then?

Then there are those parents give their sons and daughters the weirdest possible names. One of our peons named his son “Sangharsh”, meaning-a really bad fight. I don’t know if the baby was born after he had a fight with his wife or what, but dude, give the kid a break! You don’t need to haunt him with the thought that he was born out of a fight for the rest of his life! Or people who name their kids “Chhagan” or “Dhondu” or “Patang” for instance. Chhagan means waste, Dhondu means “resembling a stone” and Patang means the paper kite kids fly at the time of makar sankranti! Then there are those Mahabharat obsessed people who fill our country with Duryodhanas, Bheeshmas and Devakis. Guys! Duryodhana was the villain! Bheeshma never got the love of his mom and dad together, had a step mom of his own age and he promised her he wouldn’t marry and let her kids take over the kingdom after his dad. So in spite of being the oldest son, never got to be the king! Devaki spent half of her life incarcerated by her own brother who killed 7 of her children and even though the 8th one did turn out to be Krishna, she didn’t get to bring him up!! Point being, the poor guys were unfortunate! Why would you call your kid any of these? But people do!

Then there are those names synonymous with regions and eras. Aishwarya for instance. To me at least, it’s a synonym for “south Indian girl”. I have 6 Aishwaryas on my phone book and except for one, all are south Indians! And beat this, coz it’s almost impossible to figure out which Aishwarya one is talking about, my friends add the name of the city as a suffix to the name. So the names now are like Aishwarya Cochin, Aishwarya Chennai, Aishwarya Lucknow, Aishwarya Jodhpur and Aishwarya Pune etc. Sounds like Aishwarya Tours & Travel Company’s menu to me! Or take Sachin or Sakshi for instance. All Sachins of Sachin Tendulkar’s age were named after the famous composer Sachin Dev Burman and all Sachins of my age are named after Sachin Tendulkar. So if someone on the phone says “I’m Sachin.” You can easily guess his age! He is in his Mid 20s or late 30s as of today. The name Sakshi became a rage after “Kahani Ghar Ghar Ki” released. So all Sakshis are between the ages of 8 and 10.

I even read in the paper once that this guy from the US named his son Reebok because he himself loves Reebok shoes so much! I wont be surprised even if he sells him later claiming to be the factory outlet!

I’ll tell you what, meet William Shakespeare in the heaven (or hell, as the case may be) when you’re dead and quote William Wordsworth to him: “What’s in the name?” and see the expression on his face! Point is simply this: There is A LOT in the name! So before you name, think!

Friday, December 25, 2009

In The Cauldron Of A Legal Wizard

(My experiences as an internee with Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud)

On a breezy winter morning, listening to a pure British accent of a student from Cambridge in a mid-nineteenth century gothic stone building, with men dressed in long black robes around me, I felt as if I was in the magical world of Harry Potter. What I was witnessing every day was no less than magic either, just that words were being used instead of Wands and Acts, Rules and Sections were being cast instead of spells.

While you must have guessed I was at the High Court of Bombay, you must also be wondering how the British student from Cambridge fits the picture. Well, let me put it this way, internees under Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud* come from all over the world, including our very own DES Law College (Yes, the world really is that small!). In fact, I was introduced to a very pretty young Australian girl just a day before she was to leave and told I was her replacement. I am a single young man. I don’t think I need to write about my disappointment. Probably an article about my broken heart would have helped me much more in recuperating but there’d be nothing interesting or new about it. Colleges and law colleges in particular, are built on the foundations of broken hearts because women don’t really like young lawyers. At least in India, they’re too poor. I must write about something else if I ever want to get an article published. Honestly, if you go there you’ll just fall for some cute foreigner and get your heart broken but since I find my name on a published sheet of paper almost as attractive as that Australian girl, I’m writing about how I got there, what I did there and how it felt.

It all started in an online chat on gtalk when my friend Niharika studying in NLSIU Bangalore said she was doing an internship with Sir. Sir’s name rings so many bells in people’s ears that usually it is needless to mention that he topped through out his academic career including his law course from the University of Delhi, did his LLM and SJD both from Harvard, was the youngest person ever to be designated as a Senior Advocate, was the youngest person ever to be appointed as the Judge of the High Court of Bombay or is the son of the longest serving Chief Justice of India and is also known as a thorough gentleman and a gem of a person. I didn’t know he accepted internees until then. Naturally, I was excited about the idea of seeing this man at work. I mean how can the same man have so many feathers in his cap? Wouldn’t the cap just tear with all the holes the feathers would make?!

Anyway, so when I asked about the procedure for application she said because she was from NLSIU her application was processed within 2 days but she knew of a girl from GLC who had had to personally keep visiting the concerned people for over 3 months to finally get through. I have never understood if we could have stalwarts like Sir himself without National Law Schools there’s no reason why he would vouch for them over any other college. In my opinion students are of two types: interested and disinterested. And there’s no reason why someone who’s interested should be denied a fair chance to prove his caliber merely because he does not come from a particular college.

As luck would have it, Sir’s visit to our college was announced the very next week. He was to visit at the end of the month. At the student interaction I put my point across to Sir and guess what, not only did he accept he did not have any personal preference towards the National Law Schools, both of his sons in fact went to GLC, he personally went on to tell the gathering of the procedure to apply for an internship with him.

Don’t get over excited here! It wasn’t as simple as he made us believe. While trying to follow it I found myself standing outside the office of the Registrar (Personnel) for over 3 hours before he finally saw me. I had to visit two more times to finally know which exactly was the “clerk” I was to submit my documents to and then regret the fact that I addressed him as “clerk” in front of him because he actually was the Assistant Registrar! About 23 days later I got a letter allowing my application to work as an internee for the period I had asked. Now before you jump to the conclusion that I had to do this because I was from DES and Niharika’s application was processed within 2 days because she was from NLS, let me make it clear that Niharika had applied on Sir’s personal email id which, by the way, I now have too. It goes only to cute girls who don’t break my heart though. (:P) I still maintain there is no bias.

So now we come to the core question. What did I learn with Sir? Well, I believe what I learned can mainly be divided into four categories, legal or jurisprudential, personal, human and professional. Let me enunciate each of them one by one.

Jurisprudentially, Sir gives you an access to all the papers of his Court and I mean all which one may possibly require to decide a case. It’s as if we’re his babies, his chamber or Court is our play school and his papers, our toys. You can touch anything, read anything as long as you don’t touch administrative files and his personal papers. After reading the Court briefs of both the sides (which under normal circumstances no one except the judge has an access to) Sir expects you to prepare a Researched Note on the case which shouldn’t just be properly formatted but must also have a your own decision of the case in the form of “Conclusion”. Many times when Sir doesn’t have the time to read the entire brief, he depends on the Researched Notes of his internees. And let me tell you something cool, if he’s impressed with your note, parts of it are copy pasted in his judgment! I can’t describe how it feels to know that the words you wrote are a part of the law of the State of MaharashtraJ. Then Sir expects you to be present at the time the matter you have prepared a Researched Note on is argued and read his draft judgments in the matter later. Reading his orders in the matter is usually a “paradigm shift” experience even when you’ve read almost everything you can on a certain matter. Not because his conclusion differs from yours, it almost never does but because while reaching the same conclusion or roughly the same conclusion Sir’s judgments consider several aspects more than the ones one can think of or has thought of while making that note. To put the things in perspective, in a certain case I had worked on, I had considered about 7 aspects, Sir had considered almost 15 to 17. There are also those rare occasions when you might just get a moment to discuss one of his judgments with him. At such moments your “paradigm shift” changes into an “Aha!” experience because that discloses how many more aspects Sir had considered before deciding to put only few in his judgment. These activities, naturally, develop in you a faculty of understanding arguments, conciliating them and a brain that understands logical structures along with the possible conclusions those structures may lead you to. More importantly however, it teaches you that being a lawyer is not about knowing what the law is or where it is written but about making and interpreting law to fit the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case even when it isn’t expressly written so. To convey the point in short, Sir teaches you that cases are full of possibilities. Don’t ever think you know everything about a case. As I shall enunciate in the “personal” aspects of my experiences with Sir, even Sir himself doesn’t think he knows everything about a case.

Personally, Sir thoroughly enjoys his work. I’ve seen a smile of great satisfaction on his face whenever he hears two or more equally persuasive but contesting arguments. It is needless to mention he works hard. He’s usually read every paper of every brief in and out before he sits for its final hearing. Even then when he allots work to his internees, he’ll never say he knows everything, instead he’ll put his point across this way, “See what you find, if you find anything other than what I’ve written in my order let me know.” Or he’ll call you in his chamber if there’s a question of law he finds particularly interesting and say excitedly but very sweetly, “See what you find on this. Counsels Mr. X and Mr. Y argued this rather well.” At times his Court hours even begin as early as 9 am and end at 7 or 7:30 pm even though the official Court hours are only 11:00 am to 5:00 pm. Don’t think he’s free after 7:00 either, he takes home the drafts of all the judgments he’s dictated during the day. Even then, you’ll never see him angry or irritated no matter how long his day gets. He’ll still smile, crack jokes in the open Court room and totally kill your image of a judge if you expect a judge to be a boring oldie with grey hair and a serene face. Once a lady was arguing on her Housing Society not letting her put up a TV antenna on the top of her building. The argument went on for a while but the lady wouldn’t come to the point, neither was she ready to take help of an Advocate. Finally, Sir jokingly said “Antennas will pop out of my head if you don’t come to the point now!” I was also a witness to an incident when he stopped Senior Counsel Mr. Seervai in the middle of the argument to ask him the latest score in the on going test match between India and Sri Lanka and then expressed his disappointment on Sehwag not reaching his triple century and Sreesanth not being in great form.

From the human aspect, Sir will teach you to be an awesome human being. His private secretary’s wife wasn’t well once. She had to be taken to Hyderabad for treatment. When Sir learned of this, he called the secretary inside his chamber and said “Don’t hesitate to call me even at 2 am in the morning for anything that you may need. I can make any arrangement in any hospital for you within half an hour. You need not even worry about the expenses. They won’t charge much if I ask them not to.”

When a matter was called out once, the poor lady arguing about the antenna above appeared in person. Naturally, she didn’t know the procedural or legal aspects of her case. All she knew was that her Society wasn’t letting her put a TV antenna on top of her building. Any other judge would’ve given up, but Sir patiently listened to her for over 2 hours because he did not want injustice done to her merely because she was appearing in person. 2 hours later, after understanding the lady’s case he passed an order in her favour. THAT is Sir’s commitment to Justice.

Finally, think of this. When Sir was appointed as Judge of the High Court of Bombay in 1998, it is said, he’d paid Rs.2.5 crores as Income Tax. (Note that it was not his income. It was merely the tax he’d paid on his income.) This man could’ve earned a fortune as a Senior Counsel, thousands of times more money than the Lakh rupees per month he gets as a Judge. Yet he chose to be a Judge. And not just any Judge, an honest Judge who works very hard because he believes in the cause of justice. Being a Judge is not easy. You’ve to literally isolate yourself, give up almost all the lawyer friends you ever made in 20 odd years of practice and become a center of attention of the lawyer fraternity. Everyone is sitting there paying attention to everything you do from the most un-noticeable of your habits such has how fast or how often you have tea to where you go for your walk, what you eat and what you like. While you may believe in anything you want, in my opinion good honest judges are saints. I don’t just respect them, I worship them. The word “My Lord” has very rightly been coined. The theme for our magazine this year is “Unsung Heroes” and I sincerely think Judges fit the category.

Before I go on with my experiences from the professional aspect, it is necessary to tell all the beautiful young ladies wanting to go out with me in return for Sir’s personal email id that though I am just 22, I look a little older. While having a cup of coffee at the coffee place in the High Court people often mistook me to be an Advocate. Apart from learning the grievances of general clients, it also taught me how to behave with my black coat on.

First myth is that one doesn’t get cases initially. Just standing outside the High Court will get you loads and loads of poor clients in need of an Advocate. The most common grievance made by most clients is that their Advocate is bought out by the opposite party. So when you go out there with your black coat, the best thing you could do is to remain loyal to your client. That itself is half of the battle won. While it may not pay much initially, it will certainly guarantee you quite some client base and help you create your face value.

Listen to your client patiently, let him say all he wants to and when he finishes say all you have to. (In my case all I had to say this time was that I wasn’t an Advocate!)

Always give away your seat to an Advocate senior to you if you see him standing. Never even think of paying for your food if you happen to have it with an Advocate senior to you. It’s a custom at the bar that the senior is to pay for the junior if they happen to sit at the same table. Even taking out your wallet before him is considered impolite. Always put across your point in the most polite and sincere manner that one possibly can etc.

There are many other skills which will go a long way in making you a good Advocate, having strong legs and an athletic body with good health for instance. Believe me, as a young lawyer, you’re going to have to do a lot of running around in the Court for your senior. And when I say “running around” I mean it literally, not metaphorically!

Lastly but most importantly, observe various styles in which senior counsels argue and then develop your own. In my case I learned the following from the following counsels:

From Navroz H. Seervai, Senior Advocate- dramatize facts. Be a good story teller. It helps judges remember facts more clearly and helps you put forth your argument forcefully.

From S.P. Chinoy, Senior Advocate- Concentrate on pronunciations. Develop a high volumed but low pitched voice. Be precise and to the point.

From Rafiq Dada, Senior Advocate- Be a fluffy sugar candy with clean finger nails. Make judges fall in love with you and melt in their mouth with the way you behave, appear and talk.

From Virag Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate- Be short, simple and to the point. Don’t waste time.

And lastly, from Janak Dwarkadas, Senior Advocate- Sometimes being monotonous, putting judges to sleep with the tone of your voice or creating an unintelligible maze before judges is necessary when you don’t really have a case.

To conclude, loving what you do and enjoying it, hard work, honesty, belief in the cause of your work, being a great human being and hope that you will be able to change the world are the ingredients of the potion that creates legal wizards who make law.

So again, when I ask myself, what I learned at this internship, I get my answer in one of the dialogues from the movie “Philadelphia”. Co-incidentally, they’re also very good words to conclude:

“What do you like about law?”

“That every once in a while you get to be a part of the process of justice being made.”

I’m grateful I got to be that part.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

My Fairy

I met a fairy once
And hoped we’d have tale
We did have it,
Listen as I tell…

I cut my heart in pieces for her
And kept them on a platter
And she kept saying
“They’re sweet Prince, but we’ll talk of it later.”

Near where we met, there was a bog
And in that bog there was a frog
It so happened that she kissed it once
And Lo! It turned into a Prince

I visit that bog often,
Where a frog turned out to be that Fairy’s Prince
It turns my heart into a bog
And I write poems to reminisce…

The Happy Prince